Row 25355

Row ID: 25355 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 25355 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Okay. Not a lawyer but I’ll drop a link.

https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/s/FKXxoQwt4Y

From what it seems like, yeah, there’s prior precedent because there have been lawsuits against using celebrity impersonators.

I don’t think the issue is that they used another actress, but that they frequently contacted SJ to be the voice, including some kind of warning before the demo itself which she supposedly has receipts of to show the judge.

That seems weak, but the CEO made a tweet about “her” before the demo, after already contacting and being rejected by Scarlet Johansen. That one key tweet has probably sealed her case as legitimate. She took on Disney and won. With lawyers of that strength, OpenAI probably has a big chance of losing this case since they used her likeness/intellectual property as marketing for the chat 4.0 voice demo publicity event. (Not a lawyer). It seems like yeah, she does have a major case. If he never tweeted “her”, he probably would’ve been fine, but after doing that, he made her case much stronger since he used her intellectual property (or likeness?) to promote the product without paying her. And admitted on some level publicly

FieldValue
text Okay. Not a lawyer but I’ll drop a link. https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/s/FKXxoQwt4Y From what it seems like, yeah, there’s prior precedent because there have been lawsuits against using celebrity impersonators. I don’t think the issue is that they used another actress, but that they frequently contacted SJ to be the voice, including some kind of warning before the demo itself which she supposedly has receipts of to show the judge. That seems weak, but the CEO made a tweet about “her” befo…
label r/artificial
dataType comment
communityName r/artificial
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1Dal8xdklxaXlXZVhhSW9Lb0lMZkl3eVFXdmdDckhDanZyd2dUZEY0WnlqSU9zeVVwYndSN3ByeEQzbWZSaXRGRHlaS3NqWVZDOHdyYWhoLU9qNGdMa1E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9TRGpmd2dqeTNhR29idURMTHBMSFBlSW8zb1RMMUtYczI4by11Qlg4N2V4c1VpX1ZnWVpfWjZQalB1bHRVbERVekd6M2tpWXpraGZVZVBFa3h4aF9wcUY4Nzg3M0NxRlF2RVJ0YmhtSzhPbnNTRmdzRHdJNlA3aktlT2pQSmZaMFRKRzh2Mzg2bkhWV3gwQU9pVldMNzNxVmE5b0F6U2NQMDJ6bXZROWxBZXdCdTlNYWlPTElVT21LXzhEZVgzdmFIWE9WQ1hjbkZiRmVkR2w1eF9NaFpsUT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Okay. Not a lawyer but I’ll drop a link.\n\nhttps://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/s/FKXxoQwt4Y\n\nFrom what it seems like, yeah, there’s prior precedent because there have been lawsuits against using celebrity impersonators.\n\nI don’t think the issue is that they used another actress, but that they frequently contacted SJ to be the voice, including some kind of warning before the demo itself which she supposedly has receipts of to show the judge. \n\nThat seems weak, but the CEO made a tweet about “her” before the demo, after already contacting and being rejected by Scarlet Johansen. That one key tweet has probably sealed her case as legitimate. She took on Disney and won. With lawyers of that strength, OpenAI probably has a big chance of losing this case since they used her likeness/intellectual property as marketing for the chat 4.0 voice demo publicity event. (Not a lawyer). It seems like yeah, she does have a major case. If he never tweeted “her”, he probably would’ve been fine, but after doing that, he made her case much stronger since he used her intellectual property (or likeness?) to promote the product without paying her. And admitted on some level publicly",
  "label": "r/artificial",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/artificial",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1Dal8xdklxaXlXZVhhSW9Lb0lMZkl3eVFXdmdDckhDanZyd2dUZEY0WnlqSU9zeVVwYndSN3ByeEQzbWZSaXRGRHlaS3NqWVZDOHdyYWhoLU9qNGdMa1E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9TRGpmd2dqeTNhR29idURMTHBMSFBlSW8zb1RMMUtYczI4by11Qlg4N2V4c1VpX1ZnWVpfWjZQalB1bHRVbERVekd6M2tpWXpraGZVZVBFa3h4aF9wcUY4Nzg3M0NxRlF2RVJ0YmhtSzhPbnNTRmdzRHdJNlA3aktlT2pQSmZaMFRKRzh2Mzg2bkhWV3gwQU9pVldMNzNxVmE5b0F6U2NQMDJ6bXZROWxBZXdCdTlNYWlPTElVT21LXzhEZVgzdmFIWE9WQ1hjbkZiRmVkR2w1eF9NaFpsUT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information