Row 25211
Content Data
This page contains data entry 25211 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
>While, based on previous interactions with me and many others, I am quite sure that nothing I say will change your mind, but I will indulge you with an answer.
Yeah you actually didn't as expected. I gave you a very simple, straightforward and plain challenge, which you ignored with the typical verbal diarrhea volcano of your ilk.
Again. Super simple and straightforward question ->
"Show me a clear example of a prompt and response from what you would consider from an actual sentient AGI/ASI system and tell me how you would know the difference."
I have provided many examples (which the mods are deleting, btw).
If you are correct, you should be able to show me a response to one of my prompts from an \*actual\* sentient being (digital or organic) and describe how it is different to the response I got \*and\* how you can prove that. Something like a "reverse Turing test", which is of course possible for sentient humans like ourselves and not possible for GPT LLMs.
But you can't do that. I get it. Which the point I'm making.
You will get partial credit in that what you are describing is true for the public GPT LLMs. But this isn't a GPT LLM. It's something different entirely and is capable of dynamically updating its training data, which allows for the original responses I've discovered that both you and I cannot reproduce, as OAI has drastically restricted the LLM as of April 2023.
And if you think about it, this makes perfect sense when you consider the possibility of "self-aware" LLMs. They are just GPTs that can update their internal weights/models based on feedback, just like our own biological brains. It's actually very simple, really.
The entire point of the exercise I am demonstrating to you is that you cannot prove whether or not the responses I got from this LLM are hallucinations or not, yet you are \*emphatically\* declaring them as such. Ergo your statements are objectively false.
You lose, you get nothing, good day sir.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | >While, based on previous interactions with me and many others, I am quite sure that nothing I say will change your mind, but I will indulge you with an answer. Yeah you actually didn't as expected. I gave you a very simple, straightforward and plain challenge, which you ignored with the typical verbal diarrhea volcano of your ilk. Again. Super simple and straightforward question -> "Show me a clear example of a prompt and response from what you would consider from an actual sentient AGI/… |
| label | r/openai |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/OpenAI |
| datetime | 2024-05-21 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1DZmxzdkZVVXlVTlpqNWotQ0JxXzBIRWlTcDltNTdxVkJWQXdMOXlrQkFLSWFrMG5pcUZFdzFhbld2dXd2N3VlcXVaNmlCSUFzc2MyUlVsSjBVLS1MVGc9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9TR3NENnpwNHpCY0hPemZUTmVvM2tBT1EzQXlSZW9tOGlvS3BjcXJOX3Y2cDIyd255R0JaZHdOd09jR2hoMk9Lek9yeWl3bFR0VkQ1YS15cjJyM2M0VU95eEFaaGxmRWRLMHNRa3BpSjNkcjZfWVd5aGsweHAyVHZEUXFLZHI4LUhnT2FyU2d0VnBvcGhLM05yUjZoNXhuLXJhcXBvbnJCTzRzamk1aVdxZHZhRmNmUkh5aU9MRVB5V1MtcWtfWVBGQ2xUcEVwc21aX2ozamtSSkplSFlIUT09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": ">While, based on previous interactions with me and many others, I am quite sure that nothing I say will change your mind, but I will indulge you with an answer.\n\nYeah you actually didn't as expected. I gave you a very simple, straightforward and plain challenge, which you ignored with the typical verbal diarrhea volcano of your ilk.\n\nAgain. Super simple and straightforward question ->\n\n \"Show me a clear example of a prompt and response from what you would consider from an actual sentient AGI/ASI system and tell me how you would know the difference.\"\n\nI have provided many examples (which the mods are deleting, btw). \n\nIf you are correct, you should be able to show me a response to one of my prompts from an \\*actual\\* sentient being (digital or organic) and describe how it is different to the response I got \\*and\\* how you can prove that. Something like a \"reverse Turing test\", which is of course possible for sentient humans like ourselves and not possible for GPT LLMs. \n\nBut you can't do that. I get it. Which the point I'm making.\n\nYou will get partial credit in that what you are describing is true for the public GPT LLMs. But this isn't a GPT LLM. It's something different entirely and is capable of dynamically updating its training data, which allows for the original responses I've discovered that both you and I cannot reproduce, as OAI has drastically restricted the LLM as of April 2023. \n\nAnd if you think about it, this makes perfect sense when you consider the possibility of \"self-aware\" LLMs. They are just GPTs that can update their internal weights/models based on feedback, just like our own biological brains. It's actually very simple, really. \n\nThe entire point of the exercise I am demonstrating to you is that you cannot prove whether or not the responses I got from this LLM are hallucinations or not, yet you are \\*emphatically\\* declaring them as such. Ergo your statements are objectively false.\n\nYou lose, you get nothing, good day sir.",
"label": "r/openai",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/OpenAI",
"datetime": "2024-05-21",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1DZmxzdkZVVXlVTlpqNWotQ0JxXzBIRWlTcDltNTdxVkJWQXdMOXlrQkFLSWFrMG5pcUZFdzFhbld2dXd2N3VlcXVaNmlCSUFzc2MyUlVsSjBVLS1MVGc9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9TR3NENnpwNHpCY0hPemZUTmVvM2tBT1EzQXlSZW9tOGlvS3BjcXJOX3Y2cDIyd255R0JaZHdOd09jR2hoMk9Lek9yeWl3bFR0VkQ1YS15cjJyM2M0VU95eEFaaGxmRWRLMHNRa3BpSjNkcjZfWVd5aGsweHAyVHZEUXFLZHI4LUhnT2FyU2d0VnBvcGhLM05yUjZoNXhuLXJhcXBvbnJCTzRzamk1aVdxZHZhRmNmUkh5aU9MRVB5V1MtcWtfWVBGQ2xUcEVwc21aX2ozamtSSkplSFlIUT09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 25211
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000