Row 23916

Row ID: 23916 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 23916 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

The line isn't obvious to me. My best guess (based on your mention of "purchasing" politicians) is that you place the line at "it's not protected speech when it amounts to bribery." But that, of course, *is* the current law. Nothing in Citizens United made bribery legal. At worst, it's just made you *believe* that bribery has become harder to detect, to the point where you think it's become common, despite no real evidence of quid pro quo.

But you can't make laws based on people's beliefs, or you'd have to ban this film because countless Republicans will surely join the Trump campaign in thinking the movie "is election interference by Hollywood elites." I don't know how you can draw any line that's fairer than "anyone can say whatever they want about politics."

FieldValue
text The line isn't obvious to me. My best guess (based on your mention of "purchasing" politicians) is that you place the line at "it's not protected speech when it amounts to bribery." But that, of course, *is* the current law. Nothing in Citizens United made bribery legal. At worst, it's just made you *believe* that bribery has become harder to detect, to the point where you think it's become common, despite no real evidence of quid pro quo. But you can't make laws based on people's beliefs, or y…
label r/politics
dataType comment
communityName r/politics
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1CRDlSUUZCbmpEOWVLaFJrOU83X3hSVkh1SUVnOFI1bkxQTFJlMGVQZkZaN2xIOUx4Wkl2YVRmLW1ySUdraGk5ampMZ21FR0xCZ3RyeFh4eXNXS2NhcGc9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9SQVNDREFEaUprSkJjOFBYbUtvTlJ5aDBjRUw5NFRGM2pMT3AyLU1JYlhvYmVSam4xVU5nWm9fN0hZS0U3ckdnMVN1MTB6em9kRmUwQTRLeHRXV3g5bDZtOXA0N0lyYVM5YXlmY0Q5LXE2RU5pUEllaURPMk82YlhoNFNCYU1aWGw1UnM1T3hBdTQwcV9SU19DVlpVWHE1NTU3VDhBNGtzcWF4Z1Raa1dXend6TkdnVmtkSlRQRzVvV1NscVdMbDd0VlYtcHgwQjZ3Q1lvOUlaQjVVQ1Zxdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "The line isn't obvious to me. My best guess (based on your mention of \"purchasing\" politicians) is that you place the line at \"it's not protected speech when it amounts to bribery.\" But that, of course, *is* the current law. Nothing in Citizens United made bribery legal. At worst, it's just made you *believe* that bribery has become harder to detect, to the point where you think it's become common, despite no real evidence of quid pro quo.\n\nBut you can't make laws based on people's beliefs, or you'd have to ban this film because countless Republicans will surely join the Trump campaign in thinking the movie \"is election interference by Hollywood elites.\" I don't know how you can draw any line that's fairer than \"anyone can say whatever they want about politics.\"",
  "label": "r/politics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/politics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1CRDlSUUZCbmpEOWVLaFJrOU83X3hSVkh1SUVnOFI1bkxQTFJlMGVQZkZaN2xIOUx4Wkl2YVRmLW1ySUdraGk5ampMZ21FR0xCZ3RyeFh4eXNXS2NhcGc9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9SQVNDREFEaUprSkJjOFBYbUtvTlJ5aDBjRUw5NFRGM2pMT3AyLU1JYlhvYmVSam4xVU5nWm9fN0hZS0U3ckdnMVN1MTB6em9kRmUwQTRLeHRXV3g5bDZtOXA0N0lyYVM5YXlmY0Q5LXE2RU5pUEllaURPMk82YlhoNFNCYU1aWGw1UnM1T3hBdTQwcV9SU19DVlpVWHE1NTU3VDhBNGtzcWF4Z1Raa1dXend6TkdnVmtkSlRQRzVvV1NscVdMbDd0VlYtcHgwQjZ3Q1lvOUlaQjVVQ1Zxdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information