Row 15707

Row ID: 15707 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 15707 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

> An on record comment is admissible.

Generally an out-of-court statement is inadmissible hearsay, even if it's on video. However, it's technically not hearsay when it's a statement by a party that is offered as evidence against that party. That means that Trump couldn't introduce his own statements as evidence, but the prosecution could. Or rather, they could have before they rested their case this afternoon.

Hypothetically, if Trump were to testify, they could bring it up when they cross-examine him.

FieldValue
text > An on record comment is admissible. Generally an out-of-court statement is inadmissible hearsay, even if it's on video. However, it's technically not hearsay when it's a statement by a party that is offered as evidence against that party. That means that Trump couldn't introduce his own statements as evidence, but the prosecution could. Or rather, they could have before they rested their case this afternoon. Hypothetically, if Trump were to testify, they could bring it up when they cross-…
label r/politics
dataType comment
communityName r/politics
datetime 2024-05-20
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakw4ZFBWeG1LSzYzVWxXRDN3Sk5fV1A3SHRsOFBZRy1LY0FZVGl1bFBzNkNxSXFsSEwyQWZid0RNQjdBNHV5YXRCWV84dEhZMUFfVl9hamhSMmFQTHM4OVE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9MUHA4NGlwZ2MyLWtVTDU4Q2pKUTlnMGlWWlVLU0lxZkp1NG44S0ZwLTRRaWEyQVp5cXNJVHc5UVlUXzgtQTE3Smx0QUJSbi0wSDJtSkZ2ZElxUTA4ZFZNWmN6ZE5RUnhZaThacTBtUU1GT3JPalhpcHNpeVdVY3dxNmRkNnBkQ29tZkZQN055SGdGTlhsMVY1c204RTNjXzE2UUNSTnM5ZnR1dmdXdkFIUG0zT1RGa2xsNWU0LWRIbFY1aVFjOWpDelRyNDlQbXZrVGNpeGM0aFNGN1FoUT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "> An on record comment is admissible.\n\nGenerally an out-of-court statement is inadmissible hearsay, even if it's on video.  However, it's technically not hearsay when it's a statement by a party that is offered as evidence against that party.  That means that Trump couldn't introduce his own statements as evidence, but the prosecution could.  Or rather, they could have before they rested their case this afternoon.\n\nHypothetically, if Trump were to testify, they could bring it up when they cross-examine him.",
  "label": "r/politics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/politics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-20",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakw4ZFBWeG1LSzYzVWxXRDN3Sk5fV1A3SHRsOFBZRy1LY0FZVGl1bFBzNkNxSXFsSEwyQWZid0RNQjdBNHV5YXRCWV84dEhZMUFfVl9hamhSMmFQTHM4OVE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9MUHA4NGlwZ2MyLWtVTDU4Q2pKUTlnMGlWWlVLU0lxZkp1NG44S0ZwLTRRaWEyQVp5cXNJVHc5UVlUXzgtQTE3Smx0QUJSbi0wSDJtSkZ2ZElxUTA4ZFZNWmN6ZE5RUnhZaThacTBtUU1GT3JPalhpcHNpeVdVY3dxNmRkNnBkQ29tZkZQN055SGdGTlhsMVY1c204RTNjXzE2UUNSTnM5ZnR1dmdXdkFIUG0zT1RGa2xsNWU0LWRIbFY1aVFjOWpDelRyNDlQbXZrVGNpeGM0aFNGN1FoUT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information