Row 146

Row ID: 146 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 146 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Thanks!

I can see how [the NATO one](http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/nato_preps_biggest_military_build-up_on_russias_borders_20161026) would flag them, although it's actually reproduced from [commondreams.org](http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/10/26/nato-preps-biggest-military-build-russias-borders-cold-war) which isn't on your list. I don't really understand the methodology around the others though, aside from the observation that their whole site reads like a weird opinion blog. I only singled them out because they seem to be heavily quoted in the [Rolling Stone](http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/washington-post-blacklist-story-is-shameful-disgusting-w452543) article and I was curious, and couldn't find obvious references back to Russian news sources.

Anyway, I like the idea of what you're trying to do, if it's authentic, and appreciate the effort you've put into it. You should definitely try to clarify some of your methodology, if possible, since it looks like you're experiencing some national attention.

FieldValue
text Thanks! I can see how [the NATO one](http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/nato_preps_biggest_military_build-up_on_russias_borders_20161026) would flag them, although it's actually reproduced from [commondreams.org](http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/10/26/nato-preps-biggest-military-build-russias-borders-cold-war) which isn't on your list. I don't really understand the methodology around the others though, aside from the observation that their whole site reads like a weird opinion blog. I o…
label r/propornot
dataType comment
communityName r/PropOrNot
datetime 2016-11-30
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6NGViY0JHVVU3X1BxRzhWVWlYZDM5RHctemVVcmJ4emJVZDBCclZOLTNTTDNhclNPcmQtR1NHc2o2X2RkbFJJOFZkQnFMMVZQR1Y2dkJ5UWVOM2xONVE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9EM1JMRVFTM0dKQUFSaF9RLXdZYkx4dDg3N29pS2xwQ0Z3Z1JQdzYwZmN1cWV4SVhGYklMeEx3UjF4cWxOQm1uX25aOVBuZFFFTHpfUGZUZ3BCQlNRaEhnMG5yVmZmMmQ3Tkxta1pVbWhFd2ROSklWXy1FdWtpLXByaVRXT0U4enRpbmhEYm5lVmdpcDZpWldGa1QtdVh5MU0ybzdaMzNNNmt3aUJkMWJxN016NV9yZHh6UWhXajZyVHc0M3BQSmc1

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Thanks!\n\nI can see how [the NATO one](http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/nato_preps_biggest_military_build-up_on_russias_borders_20161026) would flag them, although it's actually reproduced from [commondreams.org](http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/10/26/nato-preps-biggest-military-build-russias-borders-cold-war) which isn't on your list.  I don't really understand the methodology around the others though, aside from the observation that their whole site reads like a weird opinion blog.  I only singled them out because they seem to be heavily quoted in the [Rolling Stone](http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/washington-post-blacklist-story-is-shameful-disgusting-w452543) article and I was curious, and couldn't find obvious references back to Russian news sources.  \n\nAnyway, I like the idea of what you're trying to do, if it's authentic, and appreciate the effort you've put into it.  You should definitely try to clarify some of your methodology, if possible, since it looks like you're experiencing some national attention.",
  "label": "r/propornot",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/PropOrNot",
  "datetime": "2016-11-30",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6NGViY0JHVVU3X1BxRzhWVWlYZDM5RHctemVVcmJ4emJVZDBCclZOLTNTTDNhclNPcmQtR1NHc2o2X2RkbFJJOFZkQnFMMVZQR1Y2dkJ5UWVOM2xONVE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9EM1JMRVFTM0dKQUFSaF9RLXdZYkx4dDg3N29pS2xwQ0Z3Z1JQdzYwZmN1cWV4SVhGYklMeEx3UjF4cWxOQm1uX25aOVBuZFFFTHpfUGZUZ3BCQlNRaEhnMG5yVmZmMmQ3Tkxta1pVbWhFd2ROSklWXy1FdWtpLXByaVRXT0U4enRpbmhEYm5lVmdpcDZpWldGa1QtdVh5MU0ybzdaMzNNNmt3aUJkMWJxN016NV9yZHh6UWhXajZyVHc0M3BQSmc1"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information