Row 1290
Content Data
This page contains data entry 1290 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
There is no **preferential duty treatment** when it comes to China. The only time you would need a Certificate of Origin from the exporter is to present it to CBP against a claim for preferential duty treatment-- not applicable for China really given that there is not a FTA in place.
**Marking requirements**. Again, claiming China is not a benefit. They will have to adhere to marking requirements regardless of what it is. This does not present a reason to need the original Country of Origin certificate from the exporter.
**Duties.** The US Customs Agent should not need it for non-preferential treatment entries. If it is a ongoing issue, then you will need to onboard the risk of clearance yourself and get a repayment agreement in place/LoC/CAI
**COO.** I would recommend making a letter attesting to the facts. Basically reiterating the COO, but on your letterhead (do not title it COO however)... add a "perjury statement" even; “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct--” People love that stuff lol.
Brass Tacks... if they keep pushing, just be forthcoming with your concern-- it is VALID!!
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | There is no **preferential duty treatment** when it comes to China. The only time you would need a Certificate of Origin from the exporter is to present it to CBP against a claim for preferential duty treatment-- not applicable for China really given that there is not a FTA in place. **Marking requirements**. Again, claiming China is not a benefit. They will have to adhere to marking requirements regardless of what it is. This does not present a reason to need the original Country of Origin cer… |
| label | r/internationaltrade |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/Internationaltrade |
| datetime | 2022-05-24 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6cXhrSEdVTm1TeURkSXdsMXRjdVN5dF8xT25mUFdJbllEeFh4cWk0NXJQQlhLMXZuNmRhbXZHQ0dfNl9uN3pQX01EZENYQmRpVE8zUGFUZElhc3NLNE9LVVJ0T2FxeW1qVDhCRXlHZk9BSWM9 |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9Ed2lDVG91YjhrUmVYc2h0WHd1RUQwUUkxdDlwa3VKNVBJVEtCaUFpUmVES29waGplcEhNMjN4NjhZeDJlSGVOMTNVdXNHa1NYb25FanBpRzUxeTJENTVlQ0NOdTljd0FVSldVZlBJNThGTmxMN2dxSlJfRmp4ZGtzWjVtM09uTTh0VDJfYXBfZW1HLVZzQjNXM2RKZjB5QzFfSHlmQmllVE5RQ0Q1eG1pSk13SVhVWW41SFFZN2V2V3AycUNHWmVkd1VTVXlPMk5aMW45eS1iR21TMWpmQT09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "There is no **preferential duty treatment** when it comes to China. The only time you would need a Certificate of Origin from the exporter is to present it to CBP against a claim for preferential duty treatment-- not applicable for China really given that there is not a FTA in place.\n\n**Marking requirements**. Again, claiming China is not a benefit. They will have to adhere to marking requirements regardless of what it is. This does not present a reason to need the original Country of Origin certificate from the exporter. \n\n**Duties.** The US Customs Agent should not need it for non-preferential treatment entries. If it is a ongoing issue, then you will need to onboard the risk of clearance yourself and get a repayment agreement in place/LoC/CAI\n\n**COO.** I would recommend making a letter attesting to the facts. Basically reiterating the COO, but on your letterhead (do not title it COO however)... add a \"perjury statement\" even; “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct--” People love that stuff lol. \n\nBrass Tacks... if they keep pushing, just be forthcoming with your concern-- it is VALID!!",
"label": "r/internationaltrade",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/Internationaltrade",
"datetime": "2022-05-24",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6cXhrSEdVTm1TeURkSXdsMXRjdVN5dF8xT25mUFdJbllEeFh4cWk0NXJQQlhLMXZuNmRhbXZHQ0dfNl9uN3pQX01EZENYQmRpVE8zUGFUZElhc3NLNE9LVVJ0T2FxeW1qVDhCRXlHZk9BSWM9",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9Ed2lDVG91YjhrUmVYc2h0WHd1RUQwUUkxdDlwa3VKNVBJVEtCaUFpUmVES29waGplcEhNMjN4NjhZeDJlSGVOMTNVdXNHa1NYb25FanBpRzUxeTJENTVlQ0NOdTljd0FVSldVZlBJNThGTmxMN2dxSlJfRmp4ZGtzWjVtM09uTTh0VDJfYXBfZW1HLVZzQjNXM2RKZjB5QzFfSHlmQmllVE5RQ0Q1eG1pSk13SVhVWW41SFFZN2V2V3AycUNHWmVkd1VTVXlPMk5aMW45eS1iR21TMWpmQT09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 1290
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000