Row 12322

Row ID: 12322 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 12322 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

The law isn't meant to be prosecuted as a stand alone offense. It's going to be prosecuted as an add-on charge when some madman bombs a Jewish temple under the guise of protesting. Much like one cannot be pulled over in a traffic stop solely for not wearing a seatbelt. However, if one is pulled over for evading the police, they're going to be prosecuted for it.

No state prosecutor is going to charge someone with wearing a medical mask for medical purposes. The ACLU would have a heyday and the person prosecuted would be a millionaire. The DA would be ridiculed and lose their job. But if a madman does bomb a Jewish temple and he's wearing a mask, he'll be prosecuted for it.

Please note that the click bait headlines are coming from purely media sources. There are no highly publicized medical journals or purely medical publications sounding off about how awful this is and how dangerous this is. No word from the ACLU or CDC or WHO either.

The original law has been in place since 1953. You find me ONE case where an individual was prosecuted for wearing a mask in public for medical reasons and I'll concede your point.

Show me one case where a person was arrested or prosecuted for wearing a mask for medical purposes since 1953. One case is all I ask. Because this law has been in effect since 1953 and it was tweaked slightly for COVID, and now they are putting it back to original. Show me one case where someone was prosecuted for wearing a medical mask for medical reasons and I will concede your point.

FieldValue
text The law isn't meant to be prosecuted as a stand alone offense. It's going to be prosecuted as an add-on charge when some madman bombs a Jewish temple under the guise of protesting. Much like one cannot be pulled over in a traffic stop solely for not wearing a seatbelt. However, if one is pulled over for evading the police, they're going to be prosecuted for it. No state prosecutor is going to charge someone with wearing a medical mask for medical purposes. The ACLU would have a heyday and the …
label r/health
dataType comment
communityName r/Health
datetime 2024-05-20
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakw2VDluNEZHU09QZHRjZ0FBSnRtWDN1VllWUVJGaDVUOXRhaGhXVENsTWVIU2Y0Y2JDclQ3Y2tERjQ1UzI5NURzdnRSYW81R3J0dk9vTmFKMVlYUmxNWGJtRXkzUGY1VTdXNW9naVBIMjZqdFE9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9KN2JvUVRJdkZRcE9Ldk4tWi0xbEtRSDZSbFdqdllTaVBySGNSb1ZrRThKLVdiUXdYNjJVWFU2YWlIMG1tOEZPTzllaDZDUHVleDZEcmhDaE5tOGJHUk1WZldGVnZpZmFQak9mdG5GSHFwQ2NkRFRVWXVFdzB2Um9HYWh3dkJNYWtRaktucGNIWFZRWFoxaHY0TUhpbGUzbHJEOExDTGItU2xtTWdBMU91Rk02QkxDSjhtVk9obVVRYWlNWUJia3dFMVhlcjcyQUQwR0hlVkdYcXNwNVVJdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "The law isn't meant to be prosecuted as a stand alone offense. It's going to be prosecuted as an add-on charge when some madman bombs a Jewish temple under the guise of protesting. Much like one cannot be pulled over in a traffic stop solely for not wearing a seatbelt. However, if one is pulled over for evading the police, they're going to be prosecuted for it. \n\nNo state prosecutor is going to charge someone with wearing a medical mask for medical purposes. The ACLU would have a heyday and the person prosecuted would be a millionaire. The DA would be ridiculed and lose their job. But if a madman does bomb a Jewish temple and he's wearing a mask, he'll be prosecuted for it. \n\nPlease note that the click bait headlines are coming from purely media sources. There are no highly publicized medical journals or purely medical publications sounding off about how awful this is and how dangerous this is. No word from the ACLU or CDC or WHO either. \n\nThe original law has been in place since 1953. You find me ONE case where an individual was prosecuted for wearing a mask in public for medical reasons and I'll concede your point. \n\nShow me one case where a person was arrested or prosecuted for wearing a mask for medical purposes since 1953. One case is all I ask. Because this law has been in effect since 1953 and it was tweaked slightly for COVID, and now they are putting it back to original. Show me one case where someone was prosecuted for wearing a medical mask for medical reasons and I will concede your point.",
  "label": "r/health",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/Health",
  "datetime": "2024-05-20",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakw2VDluNEZHU09QZHRjZ0FBSnRtWDN1VllWUVJGaDVUOXRhaGhXVENsTWVIU2Y0Y2JDclQ3Y2tERjQ1UzI5NURzdnRSYW81R3J0dk9vTmFKMVlYUmxNWGJtRXkzUGY1VTdXNW9naVBIMjZqdFE9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9KN2JvUVRJdkZRcE9Ldk4tWi0xbEtRSDZSbFdqdllTaVBySGNSb1ZrRThKLVdiUXdYNjJVWFU2YWlIMG1tOEZPTzllaDZDUHVleDZEcmhDaE5tOGJHUk1WZldGVnZpZmFQak9mdG5GSHFwQ2NkRFRVWXVFdzB2Um9HYWh3dkJNYWtRaktucGNIWFZRWFoxaHY0TUhpbGUzbHJEOExDTGItU2xtTWdBMU91Rk02QkxDSjhtVk9obVVRYWlNWUJia3dFMVhlcjcyQUQwR0hlVkdYcXNwNVVJdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information